Joy to the girl

sally05

“Those who risk agony and death to bring children into this fiasco can’t afford to be too frivolous,” wrote Christopher Hitchens, that Brit provocateur, in his outrage-fueling 2007 Vanity Fair essay on why women can’t be funny.

Or is it that frivolity, where it does spring up from the female sex, is swiftly crushed underfoot? Do we like for our most dynamic women — with or without elements of frivolity — to fit into one of three defining categories: sexual commodities, subservient creatures, sacrificial lambs. It’s evident on the national political stage: A philandering husband and a single tear seem to have rendered Hillary Clinton the eternal victim. Republican Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin feels less associated with glass-ceiling-breaking than with the porno she inspired, Who’s Nailin’ Paylin. Even feminist author Camille Paglia, in her Salon.com column, feigning not to understand Palin as a sex object, described viewing the Alaskan governer as an “Amazon warrior.” Talk about splitting hairs.

Just as I was getting really bummed that the greater storytelling world refuses to flip the script and allow a woman’s narrative to be defined by vivaciousness and humor, along came Poppy, the sunny leading lady in the character study that is the British film Happy-Go-Lucky. Writer-director Mike Leigh and frequent collaborator actress Sally Hawkins (Poppy) have brought into being a richly layered female character who is neither hooker nor doormat nor victim (nor mother nor wife nor girlfriend). Poppy is a single, poor schoolteacher who practices happiness as a way of life in an oft unkind world. She is sexy; she is at times treaded upon; she is even the victim of violence at one point; but none of these things define her. Her indefatigable good cheer does. What a revelation.

Riding her bike daydreamily through the film’s opening-credits sequence in mismatched clothes ), Poppy at first seems some iteration of the  “manic pixie dream girl,” an archetype coined by A.V. Club film critic Nathan Rabin to describe cute, eccentric, one-dimensional female characters who “[exist] solely in the fevered imaginations of sensitive writer-directors to teach broodingly soulful young men to embrace life and its infinite mysteries and adventures.” (Think Natalie Portman in Garden State or Kirsten Dunst in Elizabethtown.)

But there are few male characters to speak of in Happy-Go-Lucky, certainly none whom Poppy reinvigorates. The film doesn’t offer much in terms of plot, but makes up for it as a site for female possibilities of happiness and verve. Lewd, hyper, well-meaning, and never short on jokes, Poppy swims through life — wearing the same skirt and shoes nearly every day — effusing joy whether she is dancing in a discotheque with her girlfriends, teaching her primary-school students about bird migration, or lying on a table at her physical therapist’s office. She may be 30 and unmarried, but that doesn’t mean she has anything less than a gorgeous home life — I would go so far as to say family life — with her divine roommate of 10 years. Her bicycle may get stolen, but for Poppy, that’s just an excuse to finally get those driving lessons she’s been thinking about. Rather than blathering on about longing for love, gawky Poppy seems keenly unaware of this perceived “lack,” preferring to discuss the university plans of her colleague’s daughter and how great her students are.

In Happy-Go-Lucky, Leigh has proved there are other compelling options for female characters. He has managed to use unabashed joy and pleasure, not pain, as motivations for narrative complication. For Poppy’s driving instructor, playfulness and high-heel-wearing have never ceased to be sexual signifiers or invitations. A climactic scene in which it becomes clear that Poppy’s vivaciousness has confused and hurt him reads as a reaction to the manic pixie dream girl trend. For every man they save, how many are left in their wake?

November 7, 2008. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , . Movies. 4 comments.

Election Daze

Critical Darling awoke today with a good feeling. And it wasn’t morning wood.

For all intensive purposes, I was still a zygote during the last presidential election. (Would you shun me if I told you I didn’t even vote in’04?) I was excited to send in my absentee ballot about a week ago, but as I watch the coverage of the election today, I wish I could be home to stand in line and vote with my fellow San Antonians.

On a number of occasions, I began composing a “Sarah Palin post,” but as friends know, I get pretty emotional. It’s late now, but I’m going to try to put it into words I’m happy with.

I think it boils down to the fact — and just this once I’m going to apologize for my crudeness — that she shat on feminism, journalism, and spirituality.

In the now legendary Katie Couric interview, Palin said she considered herself a feminist. However, on NBC Nightly News more recently, she refused accept such a “label.” (I wonder how she feels about being “labeled” as a Republican.) I don’t want to speak on behalf of all liberal feminist pinko lesbo elites here, but, um,  don’t let the door hit you on your way out. I don’t think there’s such a thing as a bad  well-reasoned feminism — there are many iterations, after all — but I can’t imagine a genuine, intelligent, feeling feminist who would refuse to think outside her own bubble by charging for rape kits, by desiring to make safe and rare abortions illegal, and by insinuating that abortion clinic-bombers are not terrorists as Palin did on Nightly News.

I also can’t imagine a feminist who would deal with the fallout of the Couric interview as Palin did. I was appalled by the way she lashed out at a woman she surely could identify with. Widely thought of as a walking joke in a traditionally male job, Couric, one of the few journalists allowed access to Palin, took the opportunity to practice good journalism. She was well-researched; she demanded answers to follow-up questions; she wasn’t intimidated by her high-profile interviewee. (Yep, all that from a woman who used to dress up for Halloween on the Today Show.) McCain-Palin reacted by holding her up as a “gotcha” journalist and a “filter” for their message (as though she had been expected to corroborate or something).

With the exception of Sean Hannity, journalists have been treated like a big elitist blob not worth talking to by the Republican presidential campaign, and some folks wonder why we seem to lean left.

My family always leaned right, incidentally. (Well, until recently.) I was raised by two intense, obstinate, good-hearted, amazing women who identify as Christians, my mother and my grandmother. They nurtured my creativity, encouraged my continued study, and promoted empathy as a positive value. It was painful for me to watch Palin make a mockery of their faith by wearing it on her sleeve as she lied, said mean-spirited things (such as misappropriating Madeleine Albright’s “There’s a special place in hell” quote), and promoted ignorance.

Here’s hoping the vote is successfully Barack-ed.

I’ll leave you with this, because I find Amy Poehler’s fearlessness inspiring.

November 5, 2008. Tags: , , , , , , , , . Campaign-ger management. Leave a comment.

Tina Fey: Sexist?

Yep, and I’m a marmot.

So, if it’s sexist to portray someone as lacking substance, I guess I’m wondering why no one ever accused Will Ferrell of misandry:

If you haven’t seen the Fey-as-Palin skit in its entirety — and would like to make up your own mind, thank you — take a moment to view it here. (I’d embed it, but WordPress won’t let me).

XO.

September 16, 2008. Tags: , , . Campaign-ger management, tv. 1 comment.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.